Quantcast
Latest News

SFA shamed into half-hearted statement on Referee Operations

|
Image for SFA shamed into half-hearted statement on Referee Operations

The SFA have been shamed into issuing a statement relating to VAR coverage of Motherwell’s match against Celtic on Wednesday night.

Shortly after a ‘goal’ from Jota had been disallowed a bizarre long distance image was used to justify the decision when all that it achieved was cause confusion and raise suspicion.

The main camera on the halfway line could have been used but it seems that VAR David Dickinson went on his own instinct to disallow the goal with no supporting evidence.

A statement on Thursday morning could have cleared the issue up, instead the SFA waited to react after a day of criticism.

This morning following leaks to The Sun and Daily Mail the SFA stated:

Referee Operations can confirm that during a VAR review at Motherwell v Celtic, the footage from the relevant 18-yard line camera did not capture an appropriate view of the incident.

While the broadcast footage was only able to show a wider camera angle for viewers, Hawk-Eye technology is designed to calibrate an accurate offside decision from either of the two 18-yard line camera positions, with the subsequent VAR review determining that the Celtic player had received the ball in an offside position.

We have provided feedback to the host broadcaster on the incident as part of our regular review of the system operation.

Tellingly there is no supporting image or video clip with the statement to justify the decision to disallow the goal. No explanation is given about the ‘subsequent VAR review’ to reveal why the camera on the halfway line wasn’t used.

Should Celtic publish the reply from the SFA over the Jota VAR decision?

No, this has to be kept confidential

No, this has to be kept confidential

Yes, supporters deserve an explanation

Yes, supporters deserve an explanation

As soon as Dickinson noticed that the camera wasn’t working steps should have been taken to resolve the issue rather than hope for the best then passing off a clearly inadequate image to justify the decision. The problem was resolved by the time that Daizen Maeda scored Celtic’s second goal with a VAR image shown from the camera that was out of use for Jota’s effort.

Dickinson is scheduled to referee tomorrow’s match between Kilmarnock and Hibs, David Munro will referee Celtic v Ross County with Ewan Anderson on VAR duty.

Videocelts Extension Button

Share this article

Online and independent- the only way to be. Enjoying instant news access and reaction, following the trends if not an influencer!

0 comments

  • Suspiciousmind says:

    “HAD RECEIVED THE BALL IN AN OFFSIDE POSITION” what exactly does that mean in relation to Kyogo initiating the pass?

    • KC67 says:

      These peepil will go to any lengths to cheat us. The habits of over 100 years is proving hard to break. The Celtic board need to call out the cheating, we don’t need to accept it.

  • Mark Rouse says:

    If the camera wasn’t working for Jota, why was it working for Meada?

  • Stewart says:

    Well looks as though the slightest margenal call is changed from honest mistakes to human error, so be prepared for more of the same in future where celtic is concerned,

  • Steevo says:

    What a pile of pish. Surely it is when the pass is released and not when he receives?

Comments are closed.