Quantcast

6 thoughts on “The truth about 2016 when Brendan Rodgers faced up to the Warburton Revolution and proved the experts wrong

  1. I cursed Brendan when he left but I am happy he is back. Top class manager who will carry on dominating newco

  2. Oh dear the klan are going TONTO on FF about the BBC being told to BOLT by Celtic.
    They don’t understand why this and are desperate to find out the reason for it,one of their loonie fans posted that it’s because the BBC are going to expose child abuse facts at the club,they ARSEHOLES need locked up.
    And definitely not playing with a full or a sandwich short of a picnic.

    1. The most over hyped man in scottish football history the future england manager we were told. Scotlands sevco media shame.

  3. This revisionism is hilarious. Various Sevco sympathisers were telling me in the summer of 2016 that Brendan had been a failure at Liverpool, a flash in the pan at Swansea and the “more experienced” Warburton was going to steamroller us with his brilliant signings including the long-forgotten Joe Dodoo…. I think I enjoyed 2016/17 like few others. Only 2000/01 and 87/88 could really touch it, and it was for similar reasons – because we had totally dominated the ugly mob when all the hacks had been incessantly bigging them up as the new giants of european football on the cusp of a golden age. I can already predict how 23/24 will go, and it won’t make for pleasant viewing on planet hun.

  4. Well, as we all know from experience over the years,

    that the SMSM is exteremely good at one thing:

    revisionism.

    The only problem for them is that anyone can Google what they actually wrote

    at the time.

    Keevins, Jackson, Spiers, etc. won’t be missed.

    Personally, I have found a couple of decent online sites – like VideoCelts – and a couple

    of YouTube channels to get all my CFC information.

    I only check the SMSM for a laugh, and the Comments. 🙂

  5. Well, as we all know from experience over the years,

    the SMSM is exteremely good at one thing:

    revisionism.

    The only problem for them is that anyone can Google what they actually wrote

    at the time.

    Keevins, Jackson, Spiers, etc. won’t be missed.

    Personally, I have found a couple of decent online sites – like VideoCelts – and a couple

    of YouTube channels to get all my CFC information.

    I only check the SMSM for a laugh, and the Comments. 🙂

Comments are closed.