Quantcast

8 thoughts on “Is Buckie the issue to finally topple Doncaster and Maxwell?

  1. If I was a Buckie supporter I think I’d be asking my club why they failed to respond to letters on three occasions, then failed to request a “period of grace” since this may have afforded the club the time to make the changes/upgrades required. Sounds to me like the club either didn’t want promoted, or their admin dept needs a serious overhaul.

    Editor: That sounds fair but I suspect that there is another side to the story, whatever upgrades were required could easily have been put in place during May and June, Buckie got a good pay day from Celtic in January.

    1. I can see why the SFA can’t leave this till May or June. They have schedules to make up, and they need to know well in advance who will be taking part in each league. If Buckie were to get promoted, then fail to make the required changes, the SFA then need to change two leagues fixtures for the season. I’m absolutely no fan of the SFA, however I think Buckie are to blame here. They did get a great payout from their fixture with us, so why not get the work done, or at the very least request the “grace period” they’re entitled to?

  2. Having Neil Doncaster in charge of Scottish football is like putting Frank Spencer in charge of it. The man is an incompetent buffoon and so shameless you couldnt even mark his neck with a blowtorch. Every aspect of this decision is wrong. Buckie, Brechin and whoever finishes bottom of League Two should join forces to sue them, as they have made a complete nonsense of the entire pyramid promotion/relegation process, and continue to make Scottish football a laughing stock.

    1. Having Doncaster in charge is like asking an alkie to watch your kerryoot,it’s got disaster written all of over it.

  3. Lol more comedy gold,but should put a statement out there and call out the shenanigans that went on over at ibrox for all those years without punishment.
    Fuck them get the cards on the table and call them out.

  4. Since the SFA and (now) SPFL have suddenly become attached to their own rules it would be pertinent to ask by what ‘rules’ the rangers was admitted to SFL 3 in 2012.
    The Spartans was eligible but the rangers was NOT.
    The Spartans was a recognised football club with history, the rangers was a new company, Sevco Scotland Limited, with NO footballing history and therefore NO RIGHT to be admitted to ANY football league. No point in expecting our board to do anything as they never do but we’ve got a huge support that carries enormous clout if only it would come together and speak up where our (complicit) board does nothing. AGAIN.

    1. Better chance of a rocking horse doing a shite or even seeing Lord Lucan than our own board speaking up about anything regarding the SFA/SPFL.

Comments are closed.