There were quite a few talking points from Celtic’s win over Motherwell today but it seems that there is one huge decision that the Mainstream media don’t want to discuss.
Brendan Rodgers was asked about the injury to Adam Idah that eventually resulted in Liam Gordon getting sent off, he was asked about Luke McCowan opening the scoring, the return of Cameron Carter-Vickers from injury and a few other issues.
Gordon’s red card was one of two huge refereeing decisions, it seems that the other, a first half incident involving Daizen Maeda and Stephen O’Donneill is to be quietly forgotten.
Which is part of the reason that social media is marginalising the mainstream, the decision not to award Celtic a penalty is most certainly trending with two leading SFA officials, David Dickinson and Alan Muir failing to apply the Laws of the Game on a number of counts.
Perhaps their thoughts were elsewhere this afternoon.
? “A very good performance”
Brendan Rodgers shares his satisfaction with Celtic’s win at Fir Park & gives an update on Adam Idah after he was on the end of a late challenge ?? pic.twitter.com/Z5BHz2CdwN
— Sky Sports Scotland (@ScotlandSky) October 27, 2024
2 minutes 11 seconds, don’t mention the penalty claim
Initially Dickinson awarded a goal despite a grounded Daizen Maeda using his arm to knock the ball over the line.
Muir, on VAR duty was quick enough to spot that but how did the Celtic player end up on the ground, catapulted into pushing the ball into the net?
With the benefit of various Sky Sports cameras Muir would have noticed how Maeda got in front of O’Donnell who knocked him to the ground.
Before the use of his arm Maeda was fouled in the penalty box, rather than disallow the goal a penalty should have been awarded to Celtic.
If that wasn’t the case then Maeda should have been booked for diving or deliberate handball.
Rodgers wasn’t asked his views on the incident or if he got an explanation from any of the officials at the match
With Gordon Duncan avoiding the obvious question on Sky Sports we can expect his new bestie Willie Collum to do the same with the highly selective decisions that the SFA decide to apply transparency to in their weekly whitewash/review.
6 minutes 13 seconds in the all-in media conference with no reference to the first half penalty claim
Commentator on the BBC highlights said Maeda punched it in
Unanimous decision on Sportscene. And on the validity of the red card.
Then tomorrow on Sky Sports they will have their Monday morning expert referee telling us that the Scottish nickel&dime refs got the decision bang on.
So if you think that penalty decision was DODGY,you ain’t seen nothing yet,wait till Wednesday when Aberdeen get 1 or 2 players sent off with a couple of DODGY penalties thrown in for good measure,oh and with a goal or 2 chopped off for the Dons.
This f**ker has previous with Celtic but a lot of it is forgotten about as he’s from Aberdeen…
Does he therefore support them ? – Probably not he’s liable to be Sevco but regardless of which of these two it’s most definitely in his interests to scuppering and sabotaging Celtic…
And he’s tried it once again (unsuccessfully thankfully) but still he tried it nonetheless !
Masons protect their own ,even SFA is full of them disgusting reffing and usual suspect action or inaction from VAR .even at the den of enquity various very dubious at least decisions as usual what,s good for other teams isn’t acceptable for SEVCO they still believe they control SPL only the masons are under their control but that,s the things making the WRONG calls .
It was a definite penalty. Mainstream media not mentioning it is bs, this is why they are losing readers and viewers