Quantcast

16 thoughts on “First cracks appear in ‘transformational’ Ibrox takeover

  1. I have read Jackson’s article AGAIN…and if that’s forensic journalism…then its no wonder the Daily Rectum is disappearing down the drain…There is not one credible fact in his ramblings…Instead its filled with guesswork and total speculation…and should be treated with the contempt it deserves…You would have thought that his ” Wealth off the radar ” article would have taught him something…but obviously not…What a muppet this guy is.

  2. You’d never guess season ticket renewal was just around the corner.

    Meanwhile Patrick Stewart is busy in the basement with his root and branch audit/review, looking for the deeds and any coins that may have fallen through the floorboards.

  3. I would love to be in the room when RoughShod FC are being told they will need to comply with SOX. Controls over Financial Reporting has been something of a weakness I imagine. If talks are at an advanced stage I would imagine that the confetti issues of 24 Q4 and 25 Q1 will have been picked up in the due diligence. As for making big splashes in the transfer market in the summer, I would have thought that sports journalists would have been aware of FSR, what you can spend and the implications. Now is it the club they are buying or the company?

  4. 100 million call it fir a root brach take over. Included with that would be a new manager and team then you have to add on a stadium upgrade all the while keeping ur outgoings @ 70% of your income!! All this for a wee west of scotland glasgow based club.

    No gonnae happen

  5. “…People might ask why an NFL club would be considering getting involved in Scottish football. But I’d take a different view.

    I’d ask this question, ‘Why wouldn’t they?’. I’ve been waiting for someone to make a move like this for a long time now because it seems obvious to me that Rangers are actually a great investment opportunity…”

    The DR has really surpassed itself,

    when a previously bankrupted, dodgy EBT recipient – the Bold Bazza –

    is now dishing out ‘investment advice’ within that comic of a paper!

    Absolutely bonkers. 🙂

  6. Per Jackson:

    “…There is “broad agreement” between all parties, with current shareholders expected to sell all, or part, of their stake in the club in the coming months…”

    That is a total fabrication.

    ‘All parties’ have already come to an agreement in absolutely secrecy,

    and before anything could be leaked to the media?!

    That is just total bollox

    – with Jackson just reaffirming that he hasn’t got a Scooby about what he’s scribbling down…

  7. I hope the” investors” do their due diligence properly as the crumbling Ibroxland red brick facade is a listed building …so can’t be demolished for a shopping mall or houses , eventually.

    1. Ach the financial penalty would be doable if they knocked it down. Alternatively they could retain it and have the poshest Lidl frontage in Scotland.

  8. Sorry, but if they haven’t even started due diligence yet, this deal is not even close to being “at an advanced stage”. Nor will there be “broad agreement” on anything. Other than one party saying “we have a club to sell” and the other saying “we might be interested, but only if it stacks up”.

    Also these are not moderately wealthy, elderly, misty-eyed, local lodge members that are misguidedly prepared to throw good money after bad at a financial basket case, just because they remember going to Ibrox as wee boys with their dads to watch Jim Baxter and John Greig. These are hard nosed businessmen with absolutely no emotional attachment to either Rangers RIP Ltd or Sevco. If this does go through somehow, it will cost them a packet, for little to no guarantee that they will make the return on their investment that they will demand. And that is their sole interest here – not restoring Rangers 2.0 to some mythical glory days.

    At the end of the day, you’d be paying eye watering amounts for a club playing in what is, financially, a football backwater and operating under financial sustainability rules (in Europe at least). That will limit your ability to improve the squad, which is your only chance of eventually making a return and even that’s not guaranteed, even if UEFA let you do it. Your only other option is the Mike Ashley route of downsizing and austerity to turn a profit and build from there. I doubt the new owners, or the Orc Klanbase, will have the patience for that though

    I saw some idiot saying that the deal “values the club at £150m”. WRONG!!!! If that is the working estimate, that will be a deal valuation, not a club valuation i.e. the cost to buy the club and pay off/take on outstanding debts and so on. So right from the start, you’re paying out way more than the club’s actually worth to buy it, in the hope that it’s value rises, or that you can cream off enough dough to make it worthwhile.

    It’s also not clear if this will be a leveraged buyout – where any loans/debt taken on to buy the club is effectively then put on the club’s balance sheet (see Glazers and Man Utd), where it then acts as an albatross around its neck, while the new investors help themselves to dividends, etc. to recoup their “investment”.

    Quite honestly, they’d be better waiting for it to die again and picking up the carcass for peanuts. Worked for Big Yorkshire ‘Ands Charlie.

    It’s funny how they’re all talking about the “club” being bought over now too. Not the “holding company”, or the “engine room subsidiary”. I thought clubs had now been elevated to the status of ethereal deities, sitting on a cloud somewhere beyond the reach of human hand. Or any face painters or other creditors that they owed money to. Or was that just a 2012 thing?

  9. Looking forward to instead of playing the New Rangers we’ll be playing the Glasgow thirteeners as per their age

Comments are closed.