Quantcast

4 thoughts on “The myth of Michael Nicholson as Celtic CEO is taken to task

  1. Look at that photo of those 2 CHISLERS,Arthur Daley and Del Trotter laughing all the way to the bank.

  2. The root cause of a lot of the club’s major issues is around recruitment?

    Unsatisfactory player recruitment, and insular/parochial senior management recruitment.

    Many are ‘disappointed’ with Nicholson, his lack of visibility and lack of change at the

    club is perhaps due to a deeply ingrained culture?

    The club needs fresh ideas and new people to shake things up – continuously –

    but it doesn’t look like the major shareholders have the appetite for that?

    It does beg the question though: if Dom McKay was still CEO, where would we be now…?

  3. Thing is he shouldnt be involved (neither should the board) in transfers in the first place .. What should happen (and does at many clubs) is this .. the board allocates a budget that the manager/director of football can then use as they see fit … any sales would then allow them to exceed this budget if necessary by x% ( say for instance 40% with the remaining 60% going to the Club for running costs etc) In this way the board and CEO are taken out of the firing line and it is the Football department making Football decisions.

    As I don´t want a first team manager deciding what colour the walls should be in the boardroom , or what the cost of pies should be (as extreme examples) I don´t want a CEO or board deciding that a full back that cuts inside is worth more than one that goes on the overlap! In other words a successful WORLD CLASS club has people in roles that they understand…

Comments are closed.