Quantcast
NewsNow Logo

15 thoughts on “The Sun has a Comical Ali take on what Macquarie Bank Emergency Loan ‘really means’

  1. “used by clubs with short-term cash flow problems.” … and others with long-term cash flow problems?

    1. What happened to them using Close Brothers for short term loans ..the mob that sponsor races at the Cheltenham Festival ? The tribute act have secured a loan against future player repayments and also issued another share issue recently also …how many lights inside Ibroxland stadium need to be burned for them to have to desperately seek money from the lenders of last resort ? The alleged takeover tycoons are going to have a field day when forensically examining theRangers ‘ ledgers … especially when talks are at ‘ an advanced stage ?’

  2. Terrific article Editor…Another exposure of the way Sevco are having to operate…which can only lead to more grief…we hope…Keep shining lights into dark corners.

  3. Rangers will be going Tonto with news opps,sorry sevco there are no Rangers anymore.
    On a more serious note how the F**K are other clubs in the league not taking this matter to UEFA to deal with a kliub running insolvent,but with an advantage in the league of claiming a champions league place doing another team such as Aberdeen Hibs or Dundee United out of the chance to earn that cash.

    They obviously have players and team there they can’t afford,anybody would think that’s a sporting advantage.

  4. Macquarie Bank is known as the great white shark – and not because you get the odd one in Macquarie Lake in Oz. It has a reputation for hard-nosed dealing and ruthlessness and has its fingers in a lot of pies that subsequently go rotten (e.g. Thames Water and other privatised former state entities), but which still earn them shedloads, usually because they pile them high with debt to do so. If you look at the surge in Thames Water’s debt pile while they were involved, you will see what I mean (all of which is legal, though). Thames Water, one of the biggest water utilities in the UK, is now teetering on the edge of insolvency and will possibly require government intervention/renationalisation to save it.

    This isn’t what is happening here. However, it does support Joe’s point that it is not a charity. While The Sun lists a few other clubs that have gone down this route to try to normalise it and give it some credibility, they are mostly ones that were in a promising Champions’ League race at the time or close to promotion to the EPL – with all the wonga that getting there would bring them. The tens of millions they would get for doing this would far outweigh any costs/losses from taking on some “factoring” to try to see them over the line, making it worth the punt. Not sure that’s the case here. Seems to be more about keeping the lights on.

    Joe is also right to describe it as a corporate payday loan. Companies only use this kind of service when they are struggling financially themselves, or they have a very large number of small creditors that it is both very expensive and very difficult to get repayment from using inhouse people/resources. I doubt that being owed money in contractually binding instalments by two or three other football clubs falls into the latter category. Either way though, Macquarie (or anyone else that offers this service, to be fair) will be taking a big chunk of the sums owed for providing upfront funds. It will also mean that money that was due this summer, next summer and so on is no longer owed to Sevco. This clearly affects your cashflow and income for the next 1-2 seasons (maybe even longer) and obviously your transfer budgets in future transfer windows.

      1. Surely though this would be on the provision that Sevco had saleable assets that would bring in transfer fees high enough to pay said loan and it’s likely interest. If like in January there is no interest in the players, there will still be interest in this new investment model that is being championed. I’m just glad Pedro didn’t lend it to his business partners to prop up the defunct old firm inc

        1. With factoring, what you are selling is money/debts that you are already contractually owed. You accept that you will not get all that money back (the bank you are dealing with takes its cut obviously), but you do get a guaranteed sum and you get it upfront, now, rather than having to wait for it when it’s actually due, or having to go to the expense of collecting it yourself. That can be quite costly when you have a large number of smaller debts to collect from people, some of whom will hold out or just not pay you, knowing that what the owe is not worth pursuing through the courts. So you’re not exposed to default risk either. That passes to the bank providing the factoring service.

  5. Is it not also the case that clubs can face a points deduction for not paying employees on time, as evidenced by the 6 points deducted from Edinburgh City in January ‘24, – not that it would make any difference to this year’s title “race”?

  6. Hmmm…

    Yet another Share Issue,

    swiftly followed by the disclosure of these securitised revenues with a bank,

    …but according to the SMSM, the 49-ers’ linked person [?] is carrying out due diligence

    right now at RIFC with a view to an alleged ‘takeover’.

    Seems a bit ‘inconsistent’ ?

    The first 2 points have been publicly confirmed via the Companies House website.

    The ‘takeover’ point is only SMSM copy/paste nonsense so far.

    However, it does feel that something significant is brewing at ibrox,

    …and it doesn’t smell good! 🙂

  7. All these hacks that buried their heads in the sand for years and years crying that they weren’t financial experts

    Are suddenly now all financial masterminds

  8. The issue won’t be with the funding, the issue will be that this clumpany have defaulted on a financial agreement.. ta ta !!!

    HH

Comments are closed.