Quantcast
NewsNow Logo

9 thoughts on “The sums that don’t add up in the Ibrox ‘takeover’

  1. If the shares are bought by a ‘ consortium ‘ or whoever or whatever else , I would assume there would be loans from Bank’ s required in which to buy the shares …I could be wrong ? So, if that’s the case , then the Bank’s would technically own the Rangers majority of shares until the loans and interest payments are paid off ? I mean these individuals won’t be using their own personal savings and money to buy shares in an insolvent 13 year old club ..will they ? As i said earlier …I could be wrong !

    1. Maybe this guy Cavenaugh is just enjoying the hospitality and free publicity?I

      Who in Scottish / UK football had heard of this guy a few weeks ago?

      Raising his profile here might help him buy an English lower league club…?

  2. Ah the FAKEOVER,just how will they spin it when it all goes wrong,it will probably be Celtiic’s fault,or UEFA supposedly putting a block on the deal.
    But until then the deal will continue to be kicked down the road,until they run out of road,at which point it will to late for the BENJAMINS in the sevco support,season book money will have been gathered in by then.

  3. You couldn’t give this club to most people for free because of the massive year on year losses.

    Ocam’s razor, no fecker is paying to buy Sevco

  4. Shouldn’t it be called THE SEVCO REVIEW or is it just more Lies for Liebrox !

    1. Educate me please…I know nowt about shares but I googled their share price and it came up as 35p….on various sites…??..Am i reading it wrong ?

      Editor: There is no trading in their shares, just private transactions. Anyone wanting to buy will find plenty of sellers of pointless shares. Dave King holds 13% of the club shares and has zero influence, not even brogues and a blazer.

  5. 80M shares issued in 2016 @ 20p = £16M
    Now 533M shares issued to get cash. 20p is a nominal value as shares aren’t traded on the LSE various avenues.
    Simple dilution and shares are worth 3p. Brand has not grown much (if any) so market cap will be £30M at best -based on initial £16M
    £15M gets control of company but how much debt is tied up in soft loans to directors and shareholders and what security do they have.
    Due diligence never uncovers good news and requires confidentiality – rogue briefings could end the deal.
    Legal and warranties from the sellers may well kill this.
    Buying the shareholding will be the cheap bit. It’s the other stuff that will be the barriers – hence why King is pushing this. He doesn’t have any soft loans so he can now realise his loss on the shares and move on. At least he will get something. As for the others it depends on their appetite to write off debts.
    Still a long way to go.

    Editor: 20p is the nominal value that is put on each dilution, I’d say 3p per share is generous to get a horrendous loss making venture out of your portfolio. This article was based on the Mills & Boon stuff in the Rangers Review. Whoever was involved in the recent £5.3m loan to shares won’t be selling out a month or two later for mashers so the good news story doesn’t stack up.

  6. Nowt to report and then soon as they get a bad result

    Boom an hour later a Keith Jackson exclusive of nothing new

    Set your watch by it

Comments are closed.