Quantcast

7 thoughts on “Hampden referee Calum Scott owes 43,362 fans an explanation

  1. In the grand scheme of things it didn’t matter one little bit…

    But hey ho – That’s not the point here –

    Some Celtic fans are saying we could’ve had a player injured in that time – If so then unfortunate as it’d be the time should still be played…

    If I’ve a bet on for a 6-0 Celtic win (someone somewhere will have done as well) then I’m well pissed off…

    Yet another weekend of controversial decisions from Scottish officials…

    Quelle Surprise anyone !!!

    1. I had a 6/0 single and a double 6/0 with Maeda to score anytime – raging £240 is potentially my winnings – not withstanding that it is poor officiating as it was a couple weeks ago when Dickinson played 5 mins injury time against St Johnstone when it should’ve been at least 8 or 9 mins – lots of explanations could be used – mmmmm ?

  2. I totally agree Clach, if one had a bet ( which I do occasionally ) for over 5 goals, you’d be raging (just like the new klub wangers) , that no extra time added…very strange indeed..

  3. Just more proof that the match officials are not fit for purpose:

    they can’t even manage the playing time!

    Mibbees that’s why neither FIFA nor UEFA invite Scottish match officials to their Finals anymore?

  4. I don’t think subs coming on or off add time at the end it is up to the ref to decide if the player takes ages going off the 30 secs will be added . Seen 10 subs in a game but only about 2 or 3 mins added. Check the rules if I am wrong .

  5. Don’t think stoppage time was very important up 5.0 and St, Johnstone players dead on their feet ,why prolong it ,game wasn’t exactly on a knife edge , a comfortable victory and clean (luckily) best goal of the day was rightly chopped off as was out pen , another cup final spot booked game over

Comments are closed.