Quantcast

11 thoughts on “David Dickinson- plain incompetence or something else?

  1. Not that I expected us to do anything with it…but I anticipated 8 or 9 additional minutes…then when I saw 5…it was a WTF moment…But here’s the thing…Did BR query this…??..I would be raging if it was me standing there…It was blatant cheating…no other word for it…Oh and Sevco got 7 minutes against Hibs.

    Editor: I think that Rodgers has bigger battles. It is on the Celtic board that someone with Dickinson’s DNA is constantly involved in matches involving the top two clubs and climbing the ladder held up by Willie Collum.

    1. I would have thought that that would be in his remit…and should have been queried…Sevco got 7 for not a lot. But I agree absolutely about your Dickinson and our Board situation…Shameful that its tolerated.

    1. We know that Joe…so why is he still there…??…Our Board is not fit for purpose

      Editor: Since 21.01 on 26/7/2012 our cowardly board has been hostages to whatever the SFA wish to throw our way.

      1. …which is why I’m still confused.

        There must have been a fair bit of jiggery-pockery around the circumstances around Sevco being allowed to play Brechin City – and before The Rangers was incorporated?

        Insurance, player registration [ha!], and even the name of the away team on the Sevco Team sheet must have been ‘compromised’?

        But, if our club was complicit in facilitating the ibrox club’s return, then most of that blame can be laid squarely at Lawwell’s door?

        Unless I’m missing something else…?

      2. Yeah…but it’s getting to the unacceptable stage…surely ??..Time for banners calling it out ?

      3. Joe, would you explain your answer to TN please for clarity as I really don’t understand it.
        I know all about the events of Thurs 26th/Friday 27th July 2012, I made a study of the whole affair and have all sorts of proof as I’ve mentioned before, many times.
        It’s almost certain Lawwell knew everything yet says he’s “never seen the 5-Way etc.) I know it was also emailed to Eric Riley on 26th July.
        But WHY is Celtic’s hands tied when they’re not mentioned in the 5-Way. The 5 were SFA/SPL/SFL/Charles Green for Sevco Scotland Limited and the Administrators of Rangers (IA). I’ve called it out as fraud as that’s what I believe it is but Celtic’s part, AS FAR AS WE KNOW, was just to nod along with it. So why are we in more trouble than the rest of them? I’d really appreciate your take here and you’ve got my private email address if it’s better doing it privately, but please respond.

        Editor: Celtic know that if they kick off about referees and other issues related to the SFA some of the highly damaging paperwork from July 2012 might just leak out. No one at Celtic wants supporters to find out exactly what went on during those dark, secretive days. Although titled the Five Way Agreement there is a decent argument for replacing Five with Six.

        1. Thanks for your reply, Joe. I fully understand an open forum is not the best place to be candid, generally. If you don’t mind I’ll get back to you directly on this. I think there’s a way to make some very positive change, I just need some like minds to help do it.
          Thanks again. TicToc.

  2. Plain incompetence – Or something else….

    SOMETHING ELSE – ABSOLUTELY !

  3. Joe,

    When will people start asking how the stock market crash affects the Sevco fakeover ?

    Worth having a think about that !!!

  4. Not to mention him,early in the 2nd half, awarding us a free kick for offside (I believe) and then having it retaken from about a yard from the original place because the speed the free kick was taken had caught St Johnstone in a poor state to defend the situation.
    Cunts like him,Beaton, Clancey et al are allowed to meander carefree down their route of incompetence because of the corruption in the Celtic boardroom.
    Please,if there is a God,strike them and all of their offspring down so we can get people who are only interested in realising our club’s full potential rather than these parasites.

Comments are closed.