Quantcast

5 thoughts on “SFA whitewash over Celtic’s Ibrox penalty incidents

  1. The player in question involved in the 2nd claim Tounekti lacks any streetwise skills whatsoever,a bit like the board at parkhead.

  2. Yes, it would seem obvious that some sort of (funny handshake?) agreement
    has been made between the SFA and/or the SPFL and the TV broadcasters?

    Why would the TV broadcasters agree to avoid highlighting match officials’ ‘errors’ ?

    Well, if for example Sky replayed all the dodgy decisions numerous times during and after the game, they might be persuaded that they are ‘devaluing the product’ they have paid for…

    because it calls into question the integrity and quality of the match officials – and the value of Scottish games they show?

    It’s a simple, justifiable business decision from the broadcasters’ perspective?

    Their job is to attract viewers: assuring integrity in the game sits with the SFA…

    🙁

  3. BBC Scotland Sportscene and Sportsound ensure that the BBC’s standards of impartiality are rigorously applied.

    On the one hand, there is the never ending parade of former Ibrox players that makes up 80-90% of their pundit rota. By way of balance we get former Celtic legends Scott Allan, a Rangers fan, and Cillian Sheridan. Approximately 15 appearances in the Hoops each. Seems totally legit.

    I can’t imagine any BBC pundits that take part in the KMI panel being anything other than totally impartial such is their dedication to impartiality, fairness and sporting integrity.

  4. Some daft Bas*tards must have to,pay for these bent fu*ks in that KMI cartel…

    Celtic had better not contribute but probably fu**in will !

  5. 5way agreement anyone?

    Editor: Some would describe it as the Six Way Agreement. Peter?

Comments are closed.