Quantcast

11 thoughts on “Celtic brief their messengers on incoming transfer bid

  1. They’re worth the watching, this board. Nicholson AWOL, hold-ups with the Haissem Hassan and Mika Baur deals mean only one thing. He’s up 24/7 trying to sell our good players.

  2. Its been the same for years ffs.no surprise theyre going to sell johnston.only surprise is the money being quoted £10m..hes worth double..at least.

  3. Johnstone cannot be sold before the Champions league qualifiers, I wouldn’t let him leave in this window regardless of fee. The board will have other ideas, when they do the price should be £20 million as Everton paid over £10 million for Patterson who had played a handful of games. Loosing Meada, Johnstone, Engels, and to a lesser extent Nygren would be crazy in the same window, but I have no trust in the charlatans who sit on our board.

  4. If we sell Johnston for £10M then the club is truly lost.
    According to the article he would be a replacement for Nathan Patterson, who had played about ten matches, and we were told that he fetched £12M. So essentially Celtic will sell a proven internationalist, a mainstay of the team, for £2M leas than a kid who was sold three years ago.
    It’s hardly a deal in the “mega bucks” level. Now if they were talking Tierney money then that is a different issue but, if we sell for £10M, then we should just buy a herd of cattle and graze them on the park and give up on football.

  5. AJ is worth £20m – £25m anyday and this is a bit late in the day to be thinking of letting someone go on the cheap. If he is going ask Bodo to do the negotiation for us.

  6. £10M? In today’s market, particularly involving an EPL club, this is loose change. Let them start at £30M+ or go away and annoy someone else.

  7. Personally speaking, I have a view which may be contentious.

    I have nothing to base this on other than observations and a gut instinct.

    I believe that key members of the squad have been given improved terms, be that performance related pay or something else.

    My logic is that this is a milestone season and that will be a moneymaker for the board.

    They’d be fools not to capitalise on it.

    Editor: How would you describe the approach to Champions League qualifying over the last dozen years.

    1. To be blunt?

      Piss poor.

      That said, this is an important season, we all feel it

      Too important to feck it up.

  8. If, and it’s a big if, they want to cement the Lisbon anniversary, this is the time to do it.

    Just my pennies worth.

  9. A very cynical interpretation could be;

    Celtic and Everton have already agreed in principle about AJ’s move?

    Early rumours to prepare the Celtic support for his departure.

    Placed SMSM reports quote a low, ‘£10M’ for someone who has just performed very well at the WC.

    Announcement eventually made – and AJ is sold for, say £20M?

    Supporters are expected to think: oh, the Board did well there to get that much for AJ?

    So they sell AJ, [but do they replace him?]

    Nobody thinks AJ is only worth £10M in the current market?

  10. Mr Diamond, I really fail to see the point of your mixed messages.

    You think “…….this is a milestone season and that will be a moneymaker for the board.”

    The board milks the Lisbon Lions, as it has always done, for everything it can and does NOT need your encouragement. This nonsense: “They’d be fools not to capitalise on it.”

    EVERY year is an anniversary by definition and the 60th is nothing hugely significant so what are you on about? If they DID increase income, do you believe we’d see it on the pitch? FFS, look at what the board has done historically and continues to do! THEY NEED HUNTED!

    The only talk about the board on here, or anywhere Celtic supporters look in on, should be of removing it en bloc and replacing it with Celtic supporters. Get a grip, or are you at the wind-up?

    FFS, some Celtic ‘supporters’ are totally beyond belief, unfathomable even!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *