For the second time this season Celtic have found themselves on the wrong end of major refereeing mistakes against Rangers.
Once again, just like in the October defeat at Ibrox, there were plenty of deficiencies in the Celtic performance.
This time around the forwards were mainly to blame as they managed to score just once from the bulk of possession. Allan McGregor was forced to make only one outstanding save as Celtic’s pressure and possession failed to be converted into clear cut chances or goals.
At Ibrox in October Celtic’s main problems were in defence where goals were given away cheaply, Rangers equaliser today was another example of poor defending.
Celtic’s onfield problems are the responsibility of Tony Mowbray and ultimately the Celtic board.
The problems and shortcomings are obvious, resolving them is Mowbray’s job and he’ll be held responsible if Celtic fail to win the title this season.
Equally the Celtic board are responsible for selecting managers and providing them with the funds and support to ensure that the club is successful.
Who is referee Steve Conroy responsible to?
Who was responsible for selecting Conroy for the match?
What action will be taken to improve his decision making or are we simply to sit back comforted in the knowledge that these mistakes balance themselves out over the season?
The Celtic-Rangers game is the top fixture in Scottish football and only the best referees are given the task of taking charge of the prestige match.
Today Conroy demonstrated that he doesn’t have the decision making skills to handle top matches, hopefully it’ll be a long long time before he is again given such a high profile match.
There were two first half incidents that left Conroy open to criticism, the same sort of criticism that was directed at Craig Thomson after the October fixture which resulted in a second hand and second rate apology issued from Hugh Dallas.
Marco Fortune’s challenge on Allan McGregor was perfectly legitimate, he had his eye on the ball and headed into the net despite McGregor’s challenge.
It was an unusual goal, usually it does require a foul to beat a goalkeeper in that sort of position but there was nothing wrong with Fortune’s ‘goal’.
For reasons known only to himself Conroy decided to disallow the goal without any appeal coming from the Rangers defenders. They knew their keeper had been beaten fair and square.
Comparing that decision to the non-penalties at Ibrox in October puts Conroy in a very poor light.
Thomson failed to see the clear foul on Shaun Maloney, that can happen although when it happens two or three times in the one match it becomes very concerning.Missing an incident is more understandable than ‘seeing’ something that no-one else in the stadium witnessed.
What was it that Fortune did?
Clearly setting the standard with that mistake Conroy’s decision making was again badly at fault when Kyle Lafferty went sliding through into the leg on Andreas Hinkel.
There was no prospect of playing the ball with the ‘challenge’ clearly violent conduct- an ordering off offence.
Rather than be decisive Conroy opted out by booking Lafferty, thankfully Hinkel anticipated the challenge and no serious injury was suffered.
Some folk may recall Lafferty’s kung-fu challenge on Zheng Zhi at Ibrox which escaped even a yellow card.
Celtic and Tony Mowbray have got plenty of work to do to build up a team capable of winning the SPL title and recapturing recent Champions League achievements.
Those areas will be discussed and debated by supporters eager to see signs of improvement and activity in the transfer market this month.
Mowbray and the Celtic board are judged week by week on their performances.
Getting things right on the park will be a tough task for the Celtic manager, competing on a level playing field with competent officials capable of making correct decisions isn’t asking for too much.There are plenty of borderline decisions in football that can be looked at from two sides and the decision of the referee is accepted, reluctantly at times.
Clear cut decisions like today don’t require exceptional judgement, they were there for all to see and if referee Conroy can’t get it right he should be kept well clear of the bigger fixtures that shape championships and can decide a managers future.
Refereeing performances like we’ve witnessed in the derby matches this season are shown live throughout the UK and beyond, it’s little surprise that there will again be no Scottish officials at the World Cup or involved in the important Champions League matches.
I agree Joe that Mowbry should go I d;nt want him from the start,
all this crap we were this or that,
he say;s same after every game,
what has won in football as manager,
even had the same excuse;e with Hibs, and WBA feck off Mowbry and take peter the pointer with you
Anon –
I have read this article and cannot see where the author suggests that the manager should be sacked – he merely points out that the manager is held accountable for results. However, the manager has enjoyed only 6 months of his tenure & any rash decisions would be to the detriment of our long term success. Maybe you should reserve your judgement until the summer at the very earliest!
Get real!!!!